3-D Is One D Too Many for the DDs
This already made the rounds of the late night talk shows. But they only go for the cheap jokes.
June Playboy centerfold will be in 3D [at UPI.com]
Here at the Bureau for the Impertinently Inane, we go much more in-depth. We get immersed in the serious implications of far-reaching stories like this!
Let me explain something to the Playboy editors: This is supposed to be _fantasy_! There's a point where we don't want it to be any more real.
Will the next feature issue put funny stains in the sheets?
Or will it just stalk me at work, gloat to my ex-girlfriend, and call my mom??
Sure, one could look at a simple nude pictorial as an art object, and not a venue for participatory fantasy [some one else, that is ;-) ] But the point still stands - it's not meant to be performance art.
Hanging an image on the wall is a convenient way to _not_ be tripping over some shapely fragile sculpture. And it's very far removed from waking up next to Mona Lisa's younger sister, wondering if you can suggest another quickie before dealing with the awkward consequences.
All I'm saying is there's a deliberate bridge between accessible and fantasy. This bridge should not be crossed!
I do _not_ want to buy a magazine and wind up picking stuff out of my teeth.
And don't get me started about the potential horror of smell-o-vision!
p.s. - Just in case you didn't get it the first time...